FASHION ETHICS

I do not believe that this is ethically okay because this model looked perfectly fine after all the make up she put on there was no reason to change the way she looked.

This is worst then others because they did not just take out dark marks "if any" on her face BUT they changed her as a person completely .... who ever it was that was on that bulletin board was no longer that model but another person with completely different trates. It alright to take out a dark spot or a pimple or slobber but not if your going to completely change that person appearance by a longer neck bigger eyes smaller forehead, bigger lips and so on. The difference between Fashion photography and journalism is that one tells the facts of the matter, and the other shows Partial facts. What they both in commen is that either way they are both going to have people believe what they see . ETHICAL OR NOT.

Photojournalism Ethic

Should a photojournalists ethics be absolute or situational? A photojournalist ethics should always be absolute unless its for something that is fun or get premishion to make it situational. Because in cases such as 9/11 with that photo with the man on the building looking lika an airplain about to hit is VERY unethical due to the viewers involved in the tragedy and are affected by something so Tragic. But somehthing not unethical is like taking pimpls of a models face or croping a picture..

Can a photo really capture truth? Yes a picture CAN really catpure the truth but only if the person behind the lense is willing to fallow the rules of ABSOLUTE!.. It is t his way because its something being captured at that very point and moment of time unless of course the photo was photo shoped and edited out or in images.

decisions have you made as a photographer that "edit" reality? I took a picture of a student her at school that had many dark spots on his face and had alot of scratches all over the photo.. i croped and edited out all the dark spots and all the scratches that i could find.
Why is it important that news organizations have clearly defined ethical standards? Because the news organizations viewers EXPECT THE TRUTH! not False FACTS.

Most Unethical..

This picture is most unethical...because this was a tragic time and I think its pretty bad to take reality of a tragic time away from this scene. The line shows up on the picture on the left and is taken away on the right. even if the press thought it would be funny about the line , people would take the situation of that picture more serious.

Manipulating

This picture as far ethical this is the least unethical picture because in this photograph there taking away blemishes to make a prettier picture and make the overall woman look nicer.

wisconsin university

University of Wisconsin-Madison as a racially diverse campus sent out brosures to those who wanted to apply to the university with a fake picture. The press with U W M being a white comunnity wanted to show that it was a racially diverse campus . So a man named Borrow decided to use a picture of a african american student from another campus to be place in the picture full of white americans at a football game. I believe that it was wrong for them to do that because that student really wasn't there in reality. If they really wanted an african american student that badley the should have just found a group of friends enjoying another day on that universities campus and photographed them.

Side kick turn of avents

Mr . Snuggles showing off his puppy eye's to play the part of batman side kick!

Mr snuggles found out later that Robin was picked being that Robin was human not a bird , leading to Mr snuggles joining forces with Joker!

Cure for acne meltdown

James Dillin shows his supriseing Cure for acne wich runs in his famley's blood line.
James Dillion soon found out that he was adopted and alergic to any type of metal.!